Which is NOT a method of assessing conversational fluency?

Conversational fluency refers to the ease and efficiency with which individuals can engage in conversation, often encompassing aspects such as timing, turn-taking, and the ability to repair communication breakdowns. Assessing conversational fluency typically involves methods that directly evaluate the individual’s ability to communicate in real-world situations.

Daily logs, questionnaires, and interviews are all valid methods for assessing conversational fluency because they allow individuals to reflect on their conversational experiences, report their perceptions of fluency, and provide specific details about their interactions. These methods can gather subjective and objective data about the person's communication challenges and successes.

In contrast, voice modulation analysis primarily focuses on features such as pitch, tone, intensity, and other aspects of vocal delivery rather than the fluidity and effectiveness of conversational exchanges. While voice modulation can be an important aspect of speech, it does not directly assess the practical elements of conversational fluency, making it the exception among the provided options.